Market Structure and Comparison of Mainstream Platforms

Platform
Type
Technical Features
Advantages
Limitations

Polymarket

Decentralized

Built on Polygon, open event creation

High transparency, censorship resistance

Fragmented liquidity, compliance risk

Kalshi

Centralized & compliant

CFTC-licensed event contract exchange

Legal certainty, institutional capital inflow

Restricted by regional regulations

Augur

Decentralized

Native Ethereum smart contract system

Early innovator, robust governance

Complex UX, high gas costs

Robinhood Markets

Integrated

Retail-friendly interface

Large user base

Lacks decentralization and AI support

The market structure is gradually forming a pattern of “dual centers + innovation belt”:

  • Centralized markets emphasize compliance and institutional liquidity;

  • Decentralized markets emphasize openness and censorship resistance;

  • Emerging AI-driven platforms (such as Noise, Trepa) aim to penetrate through intelligent market making and signal analysis.

Last updated